From Fuata Jione in Australia (1 May 1999)
Before I start I will introduce myself. I was born in Itu'muta,
Rotuma in 1960. My parents are Tiu Jione and Sulu, who passed away
18 months ago. I was educated at Motusa primary and Malhaha high
school till 1976, then completed high school at Queen Victoria
School 1977/78. In 1979 I attended USP. I qualified with a Ship's
Captain's Certificate from the Australian Maritime College and
have worked in the Australian Maritime Industry since 1980. I've
achieved a personal goal to become a Master of a vessel in Australia.
My last visit to Rotuma was in 1998/1999 during Christmas for a
period of 4 days.
I have been very interested to read about Rotuman news for sometime.
I would like to share some thoughts about the affairs of Rotuman
people living in Fiji and Rotuma. Here are some comments:
The election issues show people are very divided in their
efforts to represent Rotuma in a cohesive way and provide future
direction. Whilst it is always healthy to have different opinions,
to undermine the very principle of helping each other is destined
to failure. Rotuma can do without the divisions I have seen and
heard over the last decade and more so in the recent election news.
The local issues in Rotuma, especially internal squabbles in the
districts, are getting out of hand. Unless the people in Rotuma
clean up their acts those people vying for bigger things in the
political arena have no hope of progressing Rotuma from its current
sorry state of affairs. I say this because when the Rotuma Cooperative
Association was up and running it was run by the people of Rotuma
and it was a very good example of how people can work together
in a business sense. Today companies that neglect the importance
of their people around the world are carrying heavy losses. Our
problem in Rotuma today, I believe, is that we are very good leaders--very
visionary--but we are hopelessly bad managers. People in Rotuma
will have to start from basics again. I noticed that community
work to improve roads has disappeared and everyone is waiting for
the PWD or someone else to do the work. Simple things to improve
standards in Rotuma can be done with very little or no capital
outlays at all. People in Rotuma are creating this scenario of
poverty, neglecting their duty of care, and expecting Rotumans
and people outside to help.
I am trying to work out what is really motivating our people
in Fiji and Rotuma to be so divisive on one easy issue--to help
Rotuma and its people. Having grown up in Rotuma and now a very
successful individual in Australia these issues worry me because
I myself want to put something back to Rotuma. However, I am
having second thoughts now as I feel there are a lot of issues
to resolve. I am looking at issues of health and transport. Australia
can contribute a lot to the Rotuman people in the area of health.
For example, direct links between a private a hospital in Australia
and the hospital in Rotuma is a viable option.
My views about developing Rotuma:
I do not believe that major developments in Rotuma is
the way to go. Rotuma is too small and any major development cannot
be sustained without significant population growth. But population
growth will lead to major damage to the natural environment. The
Rotuman Council's decision to ban tourism is not only sensible
but very responsible. Wherever there is tourism crime has increased.
Money as a prime motivator is a failure because it contradicts
traditional values. The culture and the skills to live off the
land are fading away slowly. I say this because my observation
is that people in Rotuma are now becoming too dependent on money
for their own survival.
Rotuma certainly needs development in education and health.
Diabetes and heart disease seem to be widespread and the way
people live and eat in Rotuma now is a major contributing factor.
Rotumans in Fiji should be encouraged to develop business opportunities
in Fiji because Fiji is a developing western society and provides
employment for Rotumans. We Rotumans have to look at ourselves
as individuals and as a group and ask ourselves what has changed
over the years and how we have managed to respond to changes.
I do not think people are adjusting to change very well because
in many ways I see the divisions among Rotumans stemming from
old beliefs our forefathers had during their days of internal
warring and cannibalism. We Rotumans have to distinguish between
modern western values and traditional values. It appears that
Rotumans in Rotuma and Fiji are steering aimlessly and without
control of their destiny. I say this with a vision to ensure
that the Rotuman people understand some very fundamental problems
to be dealt with first. One example is that Rotuma once had only
seven chiefs; now some sections have established other chiefs.
Secondly, the Methodist church groups in Rotuma have shown cracks
in their organisation and now split into two groups.
Development of a transport service between Rotuma and Fiji via
sea and air should be set up by Rotuman corporations, preferably
with an existing business organisation to reduce running costs
from the use of the already established infrastructure. An aeroplane
and a suitably sized vessel can be purchased and joint leases
with either Air Pacific or Blue Lagoon cruises or Marine Pacific
can be established to spread the cost of operations. I say this
because I know there are a lot of influential Rotumans flying
aeroplanes for Air Pacific and lots of marine management expertise
A united front is the only way to influence changes for the
benefit of all Rotumans. We Rotumans are such a diverse group
of people and I am sure one day our vision for Rotuma will come
as one; however, we cannot ignore changes that are within our
control and management. Once this is achieved the big picture
will become clearer for all Rotumans and believe me it can be
done only by the power of the people. Today in Kosovo and other
parts of the world the power of the people is a typical example
of the consequences of deep divisions in the community.
I apologise if some sections of this transcript may offend some
Rotumans. However, as long as we keep the communication lines open
in an honest forum our vision for Rotuma is achievable. I believe
big projects can only be achieved by the people and I invite your
From Fereti, le' fa on Furisau ma Misini
(19 July 2000)
I'm deeply moved on such insight and honesty that only a truly
concerned Rotuman, with genuine love for his homeland, has for
his island and people. I would just like to add, whatever it's
worth may be, an experience I witnessed as a participant in the
fundraising for the hospital in Kadavu many years ago, in Vancouver,
There were dances and 'kati' where the people and friends of Fiji
donated time and money for the support of the project. Kadavu now
benefits from the dream and hardwork of the few that made it possible.
Maybe we ought to stop thinking about how to solicit goods and
services from others but more in the line of what can we do about
it as a people, for our island.
I am sorry if it offends anyone but I, personally, don't believe
in handouts. It is very Rotuman to be proud to say, "We earned
it. I would like to solicit any ideas from the creative minds
of all you noble Rotumans, and Henry of course, on this issue.
From HF Thompson
(26 May 2003)
On the issues raised on the News Page about the
hospital, high school, and PWD
The lack of funding from the Ministry of Education,
the PWD doing its own thing, and the need for upgrading and renovating
the old hospital are three of the most important problems facing
the people on Rotuma, and every Rotuman should be paying close
The high school is where our future
lies. Those youngsters are the ones who will take care of the
island when we are gone. They are our legacy. So, every avenue
should be explored to make sure that the high school has every
thing they need. It’s a top priority. The hospital is another
top priority. It’s the only place sick people can go for
treatment on the island.
The Rotuma Council should be doing
a whole lot more instead of depending on outsiders and Fijians
to take charge of Rotuma. Rotumans should be taking care of the problems
in Rotuma. It’s your island, so take charge. Why did you
tear down the old buildings for new ones? The high school and
the hospital should be the top priorities, not new office
buildings so the council can make money. Is the Rotuma Council
going to guarantee that they won't be concentrating on making
money and not losing focus on their priorities?
I know that there are lots of Rotuman communities
all over the world who have been raising money to support projects
on the island. The seven districts have representatives and should
put some effort into raising funds for the high school and the
hospital. Do not wait for the Ministry of Education and the Ministry
of Health. Rotumans have little power and not much say in these
Departments. Non-Rotumans are in positions of authority and it
seems like they give you the run around and excuses. These are
Rotuman problems and Rotumans should stop sitting back waiting
for miracles to happen. Thousands and thousands of dollars are
being raised by these districts; try and put some into the high
school and hospital.
The problem with Rotuma now is that people want
life to be like in other countries, but Rotuma is only a small
island. Life should be simple there. People are not working on
their lands anymore and want things the easy way. Work your land
and you won't go hungry. We are a very lucky people.
From Margaret Enasio
in Sydney, Australia (1 June 2003)
Visanti Makrava, the Chairman of Rotuma Council
and Dr Ane Atalifo have done well to highlight some of the relevant
and critical issues relating to the development and betterment
of Rotuma. These have been a long time coming and are well overdue.
These problems shouldn't have been allowed in the first instance
to fester for years, as with the high school and the hospital,
before they were publicly aired in the media.
With the issues now public, the onus must rest
with the duly elected Member of Parliament and Senator for Rotuma
to champion the cause and pursue solutions with the Fiji Government.
The elected representatives of Rotuma must not shirk their responsibilities
of advocacy of Rotuman issues in Parliament. Being vocal and
strong in their representation will ensure that action will be
taken on the above issues. Rotuma has the same right and entitlement
to funding allocations as any other place in Fiji.
We all know that Rotuma is being disadvantaged
by its isolated location. I'm of the opinion that the MP and
Senator for Rotuma should reside in Rotuma to get a feel for
and an understanding of the life and needs on the island. Our
folks living in Fiji have been adequately catered for by the
Parliamentarians of the various areas they reside inand have
not had to worry about the predicaments facing Rotuma.
Learn from history and let bygones be bygones;
a full cooperative effort between the Council and our Representatives
is now needed to further Rotuma's development. Otherwise progress
will be impeded and we'll see the recurrence of the same or similar
issues time and time again.
Given its isolation, Rotuma's earning capabilities
are limited. The Council's plans for copra will go a long way
to assist our folks in Rotuma and the planned rental property
to be built will surely supplement the Council's finances to
further subsidise future projects in Rotuma. These make economical
sense and the Council should continue to pursue the issues.
From Louise Riedel
in Perth, Western Australia (5 June 2003)
I read about the trouble they have in trying to
get funding for Rotuma Hospital and I wonder if all of us Rotumans
around the world could help. I am just thinking that if we all
send $50.00 or $100.00 each from wherever we are, like in Australia,
then maybe we can help to ungrade our hospital in 'Ahau.
Our people in Rotuma must have a hospital and I
think we can all help.
Hanisiof & God Bless.
From Sarah Mellado
in Perth, Western Australia (18 March 2004)
I remember back in the 70s when
I was last in Rotuma, there wasn't much politics as there seems
to be now. This
is my first visit back to the island and I am appalled at the
number of unresolved issues concerning this little 'emrald in
After reading the various issues, one question springs to mind:
what's happened to the hard working Rotumans I grew to think
we were? There was a time when our people lived happily
without electricity and flushing cisterns, and computers!
Please don't get me wrong, I am not saying to keep Rotuma in
the dark ages, what I am saying is that we can update our way
of life without sacrificing our way of life. If there is
a growing wasteland from the tourists, the community should rally
together to create a dumping ground or tell the tourists to take
their rubbish home with them - learn from Singapore! And if no
one wants to listen, then it starts with one person! Dig
and bury and get angry! No wonder the flies and mossies
Do people back home still fish and plant for food? If so,
why this talk of relying on handouts? I don't remember
Rotuma needing so much from outsiders when I was there. Is
it becoming too hard to be self-sufficient? If so, why? I
know that in places like China, by trying so hard to keep up
with western culture, the old way of living has gone but nothing
has taken its place and so the people are slowly dying of hunger
and the cold. We are lucky in Rotuma as we have an abundance
of good weather and fertile soil, so forgive me for being ignorant
but I'm unclear on what the problem seems to be.
Another thought I had was if we could sponsor a child - a bit
like they do for children in third-world countries. This
should free up the educational expense at least?
It's been a while since I've been home, but I will never forget
where I've come from! I just want an opportunity to give
Henry Enasio in Sydney, Australia (17 April 2004)
Since the 1970s the life style we knew on Rotuma
and people's expectations have changed. The shift is toward Western
culture as a result of education, travel, books, the media etc.,
and aspirations are for more and for one’s own self-actualisation.
In some instances it's for the best, but the drift has resulted
in Rotumans losing sight of the traditions, culture, and lifestyle
we once knew.
Rotumans are better educated and children are being taught to
ask questions about issues, enabling them to become politically
involved. Such an ethos is good if it assists the leaders in their
decision making, but not if it is causes friction in the community.
With the ever increasing pressure for change around us, it's not
a sin to ask for dues and entitlements in funding that legitimately
belongs to Rotuma. Also there's nothing wrong in asking for assistance
from family and friends who can afford it and are willing to help
if asked--as the saying goes, ask and you will receive.
However, having said this, I perceive some important changes in
Rotuma. The Council is leading the way with initiatives and projects.
Rotuma has to allow development, but we have to tread carefully
and not disturb or dramatically alter the way of life on the island.
There has to be a balance and a cautious approach to the development
of Rotuma in order for it to benefit the islanders. Fortunately,
this is what the Council seems to be doing. For some, progress
may be too gradual and slow, but one has to remember that Rome
wasn't built in a day.
Just as in the poem, Rotuma Hanua Aier 'Ontou, I miss
the island and everything about it and hope that through development
things will be better for our folks back home.
From Alan Peacock in Christchurch, New Zealand
(28 March 2007)
I'm lucky with my business in that it's extremely interesting
and mentally very rewarding. Our company looks at problem situations
to come up with solutions. It's about the application of simple
ideas to bring about positive outcomes.
I researched Rotuma before visiting our family on the island in
June 2005. There I saw first hand, the issues that people discuss
in your Forum. Issues like poor diet, high cost of imported food,
lack of employment opportunities and the lack of money coming into
Rotuma for development. I learned that tourism, for Rotuma, may
not be welcomed as many Rotumans believe it would change the island
too much. I found out the reason Rotumans eat so much imported,
canned Tuna is because they lack the means to catch their own fish
( outside the lagoon ). I snorkelled in the lagoon and was appalled
by the lack of fish so abundant in the other islands in the pacific
where I've visited.
In June of last year I contacted Senator John Fatiaki with a proposal
that I had been thinking about. I had learned that Air Chathams,
under contract to Air Fiji, were over-flying the island when carting
fish out of Funafiti. I had suggested to them, that if fish was
available, would they be able to collect it from Rotuma and carry
it to Fiji for sale or export. Their reply was positive, so I contacted
the good Senator and we discussed my proposal:
That five aluminium alloy pontoon boats be provided to set
up the nucleas of a short range fishing fleet. These boats would
come complete with main and auxillary engines, radios, safety
equipment and either long-line or crayfishing set ups.
of a freezer/cooler truck for around-island (local) sales.
building of a coolstore/fish processing/ retail facility.
supply of generator/ice making faciilties for the coolstore.
a bio-fuel facility to power the generator/ice plant
This business would, I suggested, be owned by the Rotuma Council,
who could take out a commercial loan for the purchase of the equipment.
Funding doesn't appear to be an issue as the economics seem to
stack up. Much of the funding, if a feasibility study was positive,
could probably be sourced by aid agenices
The air freight cost indicated to us is $3 per kg - based on 3
tonnes a a weekly flight. The fish, to get the best price, needs
to be no older than two days, but should return ( for Pakapaka
) around $6 per kg . That means this company could be potentially
earning up to $6,000 per week after decuting freight costs. Lobster
or Crayfish might give an even better return. Based on 5 boats
and a processing facility it would directly create up to 20 jobs,
putting $2000 a week into the cashflow on the island. More jobs
would be created with the bio-fuel plant. Surplus profits, after
paying off the loan, could be split 50/50 - half to add to the
fleet and facilities, the other half to go into upgrading the island
To get any exports off the island would need either an improvement
to the airfield or the purchase of a suitable boat. Airfreight
offers the best return ( best price for fresh chilled fish ). I
held discussions were held with Villiame Leqa, when he was Chair
of the AFL Board, about when the work on the Rotuma Airfield might
take place. The geotechnical study has been completed, but funding
is an issue to carry out the remedial work to upgrade the airport
to an all-weather capacity. A figure of FJ$5 million was mentioned
to repair and seal the runway, less to put in back to crsuhed coral.
The response to the concept from Jioji Konrote, Viliame Leqa and
Jone Kubuabola was, like John's, extremely supportive - these guys
can see a positive future for Rotuma.
Senator Fatiaki suggested writing Terms of Reference for a consultancy
study to look at the viability of this project. This could be funded
via the Forum. He delivered to ToR to an official of Fiji's Ministry
of Foreign Affairs in September 2006, and was told it was just
a rubber stamping exercise before this would be presented to the
Forum. This still hasn't happened. Whether that is through laziness
or incompetence or jealousy that someone was trying to help the
Rotuman people, the ToR has not yet reached the Forum.
I travelled to Fiji for discussions on this project in November,
to meet a team of people keen to try to get this off the ground.
The enthusiasm was certainly there, but like many things, getting
action is far harder than talking about an idea. Which is a great
A successful study would be essential to securing funding,
but more importantly it would catalyse what work needed to
be done in order to get small scale in-shore fishery projects
like this, up and running. This has ramifications far wider
than just for Rotuma. The Senator had an idea of declaring
Fishery Zone" perhaps 30km or 50km wide around Rotuma in which
only Rotuman fishermen could fish - not even J/V boats would be
allowed. The biomass created in such an area would be far more
than what would be taken out each week, so this zone could be seen
as a vital tool to re-populate the over-fished resources of the
South Pacific. I took this idea to Greenpeace and they were extremely
supportive. John's idea could be the single best initiative ever
suggested to assist the region. This man should get a knighthood!
What an ecological visionary!
Policing of such areas would require a major upgrade in Airborne
Fishery Surveillance, but that's another project we're working
The Rotuma model could be extended to pehaps another 10 islands
in Fiji's group, to the Solomans, Vanuatu, Tonga and perhaps Tuvalu.
Sustainable inshore fisheries could create great wealth for the
islands of the pacific. If you don't believe that, read Thomas
Freidman's Book on Globalisation "The Lexus and the Olive
Tree' where he quotes the Tokyo Fish Market as being a tourist
drawcard where "Giant South Pacific Tuna are being auctioned
for up to US$50,000 per Fish". ( An aside - the "Gift" of
FJ$35 million in sports facilities for the Fiji 2004 South Pacific
Games was, I understand, in return for 10 years access to fishing
in Fiji's ( and Rotuman) waters - yet FJ$35 million if divided
into Tuna at US$50,00 each works out to be only 428 fish - makes
you wonder doesn't it).
Much work has already been done - boat types investigated, building
concept plans drawn to enable costing of a coolstore/processing/retail
facility, finance options investigated to fund the idea. It needs
discussing at Rotuma Council level as the island needs to own the
concept, before any further work is done. If the island wants this
concept, by all mean we're happy to carry on the work.
But at the moment the proposal has stagnated. John has told me
of his intention to purchase some small boats and a freezer truck
to at least provide a source of fish for the island, however while
this may improve diets on the island, it will do little to earn
cash reserves. It will however, be able to provide concrete evidence
of the sustainability of the fishery and John is to be commended
on taking action.
Since November I've been looking at other options of moving the
fish and have located a 20 metre catamaran in NZ that is for sale,
is built for extreme conditions, caters for 8 overnight and 30
by day and has a service speed of 30 knots. If a hi-ab crane was
added to the back deck, such a boat could easily serve the island.
The cost is $550,000 - which sounds a lot, but is it beyond the
reach of Rotuma to purchase such a vessel?? Not really. If this
inshore fishery could be established, the boat would drop the fish
freight costs to around $0.50c per kg. Take 3 tonnes of fish, getting
average $5.00 per kg ( as it would be older when getting to market)
= $15,000, less costs of boat fuels, wages etc - be generous and
say this came to $5000 a week - that would leave Rotuma with $10,000
a week. Total investment to set up such a fishery and buy the boat
would be around a $1,000,000 Dollars, yet you could potentially
pay that back in a little over 2 years, even without any overseas
aid funds? How can that not be worth exploring? So why is the ToR
still on the desk at MoFA?
The result could be a decent, Rotuman-owned Shipping service, plenty
of jobs created, and a sustainable cashflow for the Rotuma Council
to administer - if the island wants it? Much work still needs to
be done but the potential is there. No one can say that Rotuma
lacks the resources - what is needed is a key, and the will to
in conclusion, I've carried out the work so far out of a wish to
help the lot of the Rotuman people. I have had wonderful support
for Senator John Fatiaki and Minister Jioji Konrote and for that
assistance and encouragement I am extremely grateful.
My business card shows our company acts as "Export Catalysts".
We're happy to come up with ideas and show how things could be,
but it's up to the Rotuman people to want this project.
From Ms. Fakraufon (31 March 2007)
My advice to Mr. Peacock is to stop meddling in Rotuma's affairs.
You have big plans for the people of Rotuma and you say you want
to help them, but I only see exploitation.
You characterize people in Rotuma as poor, but the big problem facing people
on the island is that they are too dependent on relatives overseas and outsiders
for handouts. They have forgotten all about what God has given them--the land
and the sea. If you look at the rest of the world, there is no place like Rotuma.
Let's keep it that way. People in Rotuma need to start paying close attention
and asking questions about what the Council is up to and holding them accountable.
Rotuma is a paradise of an island, a homeland that we can visit
without having to worry about anything. My hope is for the people
to stand firm in rejecting tourism. I also hope they say no to
your ideas and that Mr. Fatiaki and Mr. Konrote will think really
hard before committing any of the island's precious resources to
a scheme like the one proposed by Mr. Peacock.
We can lose our natural resources if we are not careful. Rotumans
need to wake up and realize that everything needed for a fulfilling
life is right there. People on the island should stop telling themselves
that they need the outside world to show them how to live. Rotumans
who live abroad, when they come to visit, need to leave their luxurious
lifestyles back in their adopted countries. When visiting the island,
don't expect it to change to accommodate your urban lifestyle.
Be thankful and grateful for a place to call your own and really
Mr. Peacock, I can only say that I don't think my ancestors would be very pleased
with your ideas. To my fellow Rotumans, I say that we must be wary of outsiders
who offer to help us with self-serving schemes, and we should protect what is
rightfully ours by every means possible.
From Alan Peacock in Christchurch, New Zealand (2 March
Since Ms. Fakraufon doesn't know me, it seems rather
presumptuous of her to claim that the ideas I put forward to assist the
people of Rotuma are self-serving. I have family who are Rotuman,
and if I have ideas that I think will improve conditions for those
who live on the island, why shouldn't I be allowed to express them?
Does she have any idea how many people who live
on Rotuma have diabetes resulting from a poor diet? Does she really applaud
the lack of funding that results in people having to put up with
bad roads, a lack of regular supply vessels, and an airfield that
is often unusable? Does she mean to deny people on Rotuma the opportunity
to better their lifestyle?
In the real world in which we live, people and
live without an income. The good lady is right when she states
there is nowhere on earth like Rotuma, and surely that should be
cherished and supported. I, too, hope Rotuma doesn't go down a
road that relies on tourism, but all the modern services the island
gets via Fiji have to be funded from somewhere. Would she have
the people of Rotuma live without electricity, fuel, modern appliances,
prompt and effective health care and quality education for Rotuma's
children? If she doesn't want Rotumans who live away from the island
to help fund these, where does she expect the funding to come
Ms. Fakraufon says the people forget what God has given them in
the land and the sea. All I am suggesting is that the people of
Rotuma, not some foreign companies, should be harvesting those
resources and putting the earnings back into supporting the island.
Surely she'd agree that this would reduce the reliance on family
overseas, which she says is a issue. I've yet to see on these pages
anyone else come up with a better idea to make the island self-sufficient
for those things that aren't supplied by God, the land or the sea.
I still have sitting here at work an oxygen resuscitation
kit that I have been given as a donation for the island of Rotuma.
Given that the Fiji Govt wanted me to pay duty of the last $3000
worth of signs that my wife and I donated to the Rotuma hospital,
I asked, a year and a half ago, for someone in Rotuma
to write to the Fiji Ministry of Health to get a letter excusing
duty on this oxygen kit and the other medical supplies I have gathered
for the hospital. Perhaps Ms. Fakraufon would care to see if she
can get through the red tape in Suva to get the duty rebated, or
perhaps she has a better idea on how to gather real assistance
for the island and see it distributed.
Self-serving? Many people complain about what
is wrong; to me, the proof of concern is what someone is prepared
to do about it.
From Pasirio Kitione in Suva (20 April 2007)
Maybe if the forum readers knew Mr. Peacock and his association to the island, things would be much easier to understand. In his first letter he said that there are few fish in the lagoons, but then proposes to operate a fisheries business? The LajeRotuma initiative group may be able to comment on this. Peacock's business plans look big scale; how long before all the lobster, tuna and reef fish become but a story to tell the young of tomorrow?
In regards to poor diets and associated diseases, there is a definite need to train and persuade the people to look after food sources, to correctly harvest and prepare 'balanced diet' meals and to explore and adopt initiatives to sustain the supply and expand the variety of fruit and vegetable sources. This should be the responsibility of the council, assisted by the agriculture, health and education ministry representatives. Directives should go from the council to the chiefs and then to ho'aga to kaunohoga.
The ran papai at Elsio
that was buried so Rotuma can have an airstrip is an irreplaceable
food source loss to the people of Malha'a. Why was it not shifted
further inland to save this food source? Is this the price for
economic development and progress? Plane fare tickets are
as high as the flight routes to and from the island. A Rotuman
was among the first locals to acquire a foreign going masters
merchant navy certificate and many others followed as navigators
and engineers yet the island still hasn't a boat of its own.
I believe that the idea of empowering the people
to earn is a grand one. The commercial aspect of harvesting must
be understood, including the fact that resources are not inexhaustible. Training is needed so that business is operated within the resource capabilities of the island's system. From copra to cocoa and vanilla, none has remained a reliable revenue source. When I buy 12 coconuts from the market here in Suva for $4 I think of how hard it is to fill a basket of copra for about $2. If the transportation issue can be sorted out, developing and harvesting from the land and sea will provide a sure alternative to the big city, an education and the overcrowded suburbs of a foreign land. One would be able to stay on the island after secondary school to tend the land, to fish and to earn money
from organic produce and fresh seafood sold in the international
market. There's a catch though --the international market will
demand international standards from producers. If Samoan bananas
can be marketed in New Zealand and Tahitian vanilla beans sold
to the world, why can't we have a piece of the action as well?
Let the island be the unique holiday destination to its people, let conservation be about what to do at village and family levels, managing waste, protecting the environment and managing harvests. Tour operators will want the sandy beaches for their customers; they will snorkel, scuba dive, trek and produce visible and invisible waste. Tourism will require people to work every day, even Sunday. Tourism will bring strangers and then more strangers. Let the tourists be
sons, daughters, families and friends of Rotuma.
From Monifa Fiu in Suva (20 April 2007)
It is interesting to note that much of the Rotuma development discussion centres around exploratory issues LajeRotuma (LRI) discusses in its environmental awareness/education as well as research/ outreach initiative on Rotuma, and yet LRI is not mentioned. This could mean 1) LRI is not effective in presenting its work to the public. Please note that LRI recently updated its webpage (thanks
to Alan and Jan) and its reports have been placed online. LRI
may not be messaging its work strongly enough to other stakeholder groups other than the island community. 2) LRI is not effectively showcasing its efforts and how the wider Rotuman community could utilise updated information collected by the team to enhance its understanding of Rotuma today. Since its inception in 2002 from an environmental awareness and education outreach initiative carried out by a group of young people, LajeRotuma has evolved into a multi-disciplinary, integrated approach in its vision and goal to enhance islanders' understanding of their island environment for better mangement of its natural resources. This is an outcome of lessons learnt during its past four years of experience through trial and error with and
interacting with our own kinsmen.
In other words, LRI has collected a lot of baseline information necessary for any potential user interested in Rotuma's development. The baseline information we have produced includes: a socio-economic survey conducted in 2003-2004; community natural resource management workshops conducted between 2002-2005 in Savlei, Juju, Pepjei, Motusa, Tuakoi; the status of coral reef monitoring (and linked inshore fisheries potential) annually 2002, 2004, 2006.
It is near the end of Phase 2 for LajeRotuma and its outreach message in primary
schools and communities on Rotuma remains strong despite persisting
challenges such as the eyesore of the grounded vessel at Oinafa
So I would encourage considering LajeRotuma as
an essential group that could provide baseline information which
can prove useful for anyone exploring development options in
Rotuma. Considering the current economic climate in the world,
I believe Rotuma has potential for development; however, we must sustainably manage our island's ecological, environmental and cultural heritage. The question of how is what most of us involved in LajeRotuma Initiative strive to understand including how to mainstream
this thinking down to the village level, so that it is reflected
in planning activities and LRI's outreach program on Rotuma.
Monifa Fiu ( LajeRotuma contact)
From Pasirio Kitione in Nadera, Suva
It seems that the concerns of the common people are insignificant
and go unheeded when politicians and bureaucrats implement strategic
plans to assist rural communities. Is damage to fruit trees (many
were cut down), mahogany and sa'aga — plants that have sustained
the people of Hapmak — the price for a high voltage line
above their heads till the end of days? What happened to that underground
line, the result of the back-breaking work of digging done by the
males of the communities? A work that many involved in were proud
of, in that unlike Suva and the big cities, there were no dangerous
live lines exposed for people to worry about. Why was the community
ignored and not involved in the discussion of such an important
issue? Why is the decision of overhead powerlines made by just
the community and government department leaders? Why should the
people keep quiet, shut up and allow such ill-informed, economic
based and non-inclusive decisions to be implemented? Why should
the people allow their lives and that of future generations to
be subjected to a safety risk that can be addressed and prevented
today? Why can’t the interest, safety and well-being of the
community take precedence over all else?
From Pasirio Kitione in Nadera, Suva (7 November 2010)
When the airstrip was completed, a board was put up at the end of the runway with 1400 meters painted in red on it. The people of Elsio lost the lag hanue, access to a well (they say it draws the cleanest and sweetest fresh water and that the village of Malha'a drink from). Daily after school chores of feeding the pigs and gathering firewood also included the occasional footrace across the gravel strip from the airport landcruiser; as youngsters we thought it was daring and great fun.
Thirty-one years on and the news of another 20 meters for the airstrip together with the ten or so meters cleared for the power poles makes news, sad news. The questions are many. Why the extra 40 metres? Why the power poles? Why an international airport? Why the name Bainimarama? Why are the buses rusting and rotting away? Why the buried wells? There maybe a simple reason for it all; the people want what 'others' have—development, market access and opportunity. The government in its quest to make sense and reason of her loans and taxes, provides the funding and pushes the social and economic benefits that such projects will create, In return it requires land—land that Rotuma does not have, especially 'Elsio.
What is of little value will be of no great loss. Derek Derenalagi, the Brittish army soldier from Nawaka on Close Up tonight (11/7), tells of how 'he values life now'. Rotuma and her people need a Derek-like leader to protect her interests, heritage and natural beauty. With the rate of progress and priorities on the island today, we are fast catching up to some of our Pacific neighbours; we will also have contaminated lagoons and dying coral reefs (if it's not happening already) because of the rubbish created from business—how it is disposed—and the push for diesel fuel generation. The trade-offs are immense and controversial: jet engines and little land, businesses and bigger landfills, fluorescent lights and shadeless open roads, and a foreign named facilityforeign funded in your own 'foreign' home island.
From Yvonne Aitu SuniaMafileo in Manteca, California (8 November 2010)
Pasirio Kitione has made a realistic, genuine point of what will happen to our island Rotuma and her future developments if Rotumans themselves do not speak up. And of course, like any other activity, the actual "doing" part of this will determine our ocean, water management, pollution, cultural development, language and other developments. The day has arrived (or passed) that the members of the Rotuma Island Council need to weigh the possibilities of what kinds of progress Rotuma will deem acceptable. Like Pasirio mentioned, with the onset of gasoline generators, the islanders want progress (just like how the rest of us enjoy our lives in very modern facilities at the expense of this planet)… they want electricity and other services permanently! Sadly, the idea that "what's over there" is always better - it's not! You're thinking: easy for me to say, right!? Welcome to life's paradoxes!
Imagine the idea of an "International Airport." It is such an enthralling concept for your typical villager - how about that: Rotuma will be accessible to the world! And will the Rotuma Island Council name every new development after the investor? Outrageous as it may seem, but Rotuman chiefs are only doing what the rest of the world is doing - money talks, as your kau iomag kau might say.
The Rotuma Island Council must not be aware of the number of Rotumans in Viti Levu, Vanua Levu, Australia, New Zealand, USA and Canada who certainly have sent sufficient remittances back to Rotuma. Perhaps the idea of collaboration (inclusion of Rotumans globally) can be introduced to the Rotuma Island Council so as to make adequate use of the Internet, which is available to the island - want the modern times? let's Skype! I don't know that if I were to return to Rotuma and to offer what assistance I may have to our elders if they would be willing to even lend me their time. I could easily be written off as a "child" and one who has been gone too long to know traditional Rotuman customs and etiquette. But just like Pasirio said, this could easily happen, soon, ". . . jet engines and little land, businesses and bigger landfills, fluorescent lights and shadeless open roads, and a foreign named facility foreign funded in your own 'foreign' home island!"
From Pasepa Hiagi Emosi from Solmena, Malhaha (9 December 2010)
Gou fup se Rotuma ma gou kat mao'akia ra 'os Otmote Rotuma. 'Is alalum pau 'is leum e Rotuma po e tela'a ma tonu ia te fuamomou. Is kat vara 'e ta teet. 'is kat a'foira ta le'et 'ea ia noh sog, ne ta te raksa' ne 'is a'foi soksok 'e Fiti ma Hanua helava sokoen e Rotuma.
'Is kat rae'era alalum rourout gagaja na se 'is kamatama e kamataga ma hele'umea se on 'i'i. 'Is kat noh fea ra, 'is noh 'oaf'oaf pau 'e 'os hanua. Gagaja na se'os pear lelei rourout la 'is la hao te ma 'es'ao'ek a'lelei.
Te'et gou rae, 'e av hete moea Mor ta ti' fuamomou famori pak (pack) mori ma na se Fiti ma tog'ak, vohiag ne moea morta hele'um se 'on 'i'i 'ae kat raera ta mor fuamomout 'e 'os Otmote Rotuma. Mori la' la ofien.
Figalelei, gou 'inea te ma'oi pau 'is pa'es la fu'ak (upgrade) se 'os Otmote ka kop la 'inea on lelei ma on raksa' ne te'e. Mone (Money)ma noh lelei ia teet is kop la a'hae a'totoak ma haifaegag se'. Te ma'oi 'is po la re la po selen se os otmote Rotuma ka kat mane'ak ra 'os hanua ma nohnoho.
E av het RCA ta fu 'e Rotuma gou 'inea gou le' rak het 'e avheta'ag. Famori noh lelei pau, Haharagi kat la' ti' ra se Fiti po 'e iris garue e RCA ta. Gou kel se fup haharag ta keleag lelei pau ka manea' sor pau. E av ne Kesmas (Christmas) ta ho' ma famori la' se RCA ta la tikoia 'oris vaevae fup ta (Dividend from the shares). Rotuma keleag lelei, ka hoi e haharag keleag lelei (fa ma haina).
A'haet leum se gou kepoi ka 'is hugag'esea la saea ta koroat fak se RCA ta ma rak'ak te(train) se 'os haharag ne otmote Rotuma la garue'ak business ta. Re fakma se re het Wilson Inia re se 'is famor Rotuma.
Gou inea kat 'es ta le'et ne noh e Rotuma e av het RCA ta fu e la 'ea ne ia kat (benefit)ra 'e koroa ta. Famor 'atakoa rae 'on lelei ma 'on 'es'ao se Otmote Rotuma.
Te'is a'hae het gou rak'akiof la hoiasoag se 'os Otmota.
From Henry Enasio in Ahau, Rotuma (7 January 2011) ‘Ut‘akia Rotuma Download PDF
From Henry Enasio in Suva (28 May 2012) Ways To Fund Rotuma's Development Projects Download PDF
Send responses to this essay to Rotuman
Forum for posting. Please include your full name and
current home city.